Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: CSMA/CD


From: Adam Balogh <adam () vattnet net>
Date: 22 Aug 2003 10:40:05 +0200

On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 20:12, David Nichols wrote:
You are talking about two different things. Ethernet, and TCP/IP.  Even
thought the combination of the two is the most common today, they are not
the same thing.  You can run TCP/IP over token ring, or IPX/SPX over
Ethernet.  Basically Ethernet (or Token Ring) are layers 1 and 2 while
TCP/IP (or IPX/SPX) are layers 3 and above.
You wouldn't re-write the TCP/IP stack, but the device driver for the
Ethernet card.  Even thatmay not work because the CSMA/CD may be done
entirely in hardware on the card

Working-on-my-CCNA-as-well-ly
David Nichols

----- Original Message -----
From: ". ." <ajfomania () hotmail com>
To: <Security-basics () securityfocus com>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 7:08 AM
Subject: CSMA/CD


Hi there!
I'm currently reading a CCNA book, and I've got some questions I can't
find
an answer to.
The Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection checks if there
is any traffic on the wire and then starts to send the host's data, if
someone tryes to send at the same time, the sending host sends the
"trying"
host a jam signal that would make the trying host to wait.If the trying
host
get's 15 jam signals at one time, it times out.

Some questions came up at this chapter. Is there any possibility to write
a
program that sends jam signals to other hosts within the same broadcast
domain until they timed out and died ? Does this mean that IF you where to
write this program, actually needed to rewrite a part of the  tcp/ip
protocol stack ? Isn't this a big issue?

Sorry for my bad english..

Best Regards: Fredrik Wessberg

_________________________________________________________________


When a nic receives a jam-signal it randomises a number between 1-65536
ns/us(don't recall/depends on nic). This is a delay it uses before it
resends the package. The chances that 2 nic's randomises the same number
15 times is indeed minimal. This hasn't really anything to do with
TCP/IP since this in layer 1 and 2.

/Adam





---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: