Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: TCP/IP CRC question
From: Jonathan Loh <kj6loh () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
So that the other layers can do validation checking. Speeds things up. So everytime you see a packet you do not have to read the whole thing. You can just read the header and if that's bad you know the whole thing is bad. --- Jorge Mendez Bonini <jlmb () cableonda net> wrote:
I've been reading about the TCP/IP protocol stack (TCP/Ilustrated Vol1 by Richard Stevens) lately and since Ethernet is quite common nowadays almost all link layer examples refer to it (I also checked Douglas Comer Internetworking with TCP/IP vol1). I tried searching RFC but found it very time consuming without good results (maybe I'm not used to it...yet) The Ethernet Frame contains a field known as FCS which contains a CRC. Now, my question is: If the CRC is generated from DATA field among others, What's the point of using checksums on the upper protocolos (IP checksums etc..)? Thanks for your time.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Current thread:
- TCP/IP CRC question Jorge Mendez Bonini (Oct 06)
- RE: TCP/IP CRC question David Gillett (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Jonathan Loh (Oct 07)
- RE: TCP/IP CRC question Shaineel Singh (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Alex V . Lukyanenko (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Fernando Gont (Oct 07)
- RE: TCP/IP CRC question Shaineel Singh (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Fernando Gont (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Miles Stevenson (Oct 07)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Miles Stevenson (Oct 08)
- RE: TCP/IP CRC question Clement Dupuis (Oct 12)
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Miles Stevenson (Oct 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TCP/IP CRC question Don Parker (Oct 07)
(Thread continues...)
