Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: terminal server security vs vpn
From: abhicc285 () gmail com
Date: 14 Aug 2007 05:25:47 -0000
Hi Juan, One of the another solution can be to use SSH Tunnels. However if your users want to use applications that do not have known port (UDP, port ranges or dynamic ports)the solution will not work. For client less VPN, SSL VPN will be the appropriate solution. However again based upon number of users you can pick the appropriate solution.
Current thread:
- terminal server security vs vpn Juan B (Aug 13)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Chris Barber (Aug 13)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Brent Kern (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Aug 14)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Chandresh Dedhia (Aug 14)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Brent Kern (Aug 14)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Beauford, Jason (Aug 13)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Deno Vichas (Aug 13)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Mngadi, Simphiwe (SS) (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Isaac Perez (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Brian Loe (Aug 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn abhicc285 (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn nobledark (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Chris Barber (Aug 13)
