Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: FW: Skype allowance
From: Cal Frye <cjf () CALFRYE COM>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:36:15 -0400
Kutil, Charlie D. wrote:
Can anyone share their universities stance on the utilization of Skype on the university network? Are you blocking it, allowing it, or ambivalent towards the application?
Our Language department is using Skype in lab classes, with an entire class here calling an ESL class in Barcelona, for example, and chatting away in both languages. It's something exciting to watch. Further, regarding our residence halls, we work to protect traffic like Skype or Warcraft, since these folks live here. For international students, Skype may be the best means of calling home. I have classes defined in our Packetshaper for Skype: Skype-Control, Priority(5) Skype-Data, Rate(5) 0 These, along with Ventrilo and other VoIP classes, are within a partition of 10% of our total bandwidth (6Mb/s out of 60M). -- Regards, -- Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College www.calfrye.com, www.pitalabs.com "The question for society is not whether the criminal deserves to die, but does government deserve the right to kill?" -- Mary Catherine Cassidy.
Current thread:
- FW: Skype allowance Kutil, Charlie D. (Jun 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Elliot Kendall (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Steve Schuster (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Visser, Ernest (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Cal Frye (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Joel Rosenblatt (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Samuel Young (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance David Gillett (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Martin Radford (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Michael Renne (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Cal Frye (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Tomo (Jun 07)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Cal Frye (Jun 08)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Tomo (Jun 08)
- Re: FW: Skype allowance Cal Frye (Jun 08)
(Thread continues...)
