Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform
From: "Basgen, Brian" <bbasgen () PIMA EDU>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:23:05 -0700
We are also using NitroSecurity SIM and have been very happy with it as well.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brian Basgen
Information Security
Pima Community College
________________________________________
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Brian Epstein
[bepstein () IAS EDU]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 11:18 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] NitroSecurity SIEM platform
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We have been NitroSecurity customers for a number of years now. We
have always been impressed with the software they provide and their
reporting infrastructure.
We have run into various hardware issues over the years, specifically
with their IPS device. I believe that they have worked out many of the
kinks. Only suggestion I have is to purchase their products that
utilize disk mirroring and redundant power supplies.
For critical networks, you may decide to make redundant networking
paths around their IPS in the event of total hardware failure.
They have typically been very responsive with problems and have taken
some suggestions for feature updates. I think with recent acquisitions,
they have really gone far with their SIEM product. I'm excited to
upgrade to 8.3 soon.
One last note, as with any IPS & SIEM device, it takes a lot of time to
tune. In the educational sector, you may allow certain things that
corporations would not. This means you have to go through and disable
certain protections on by default in the IPS. This takes time.
In the end, solid product, cost effective. Be aware of hardware and
redundancy limitations, and make sure to have time and resources for
proper configuration.
Thanks,
ep
- --
Brian Epstein <bepstein () ias edu> +1 609-734-8179
Network and Security Officer Institute for Advanced Study
Key fingerprint = 128A 38F4 4CFA 5EDB 99CE 4734 6117 4C25 0371 C12A
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFKafr9YRdMJQNxwSoRAk/7AJ9ZQRsDFMAVvjklvb2d+CgSbF1vSgCff/vz
b/lSnCKqEudhY9yAIIuxKn4=
=dkxn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- NitroSecurity SIEM platform Charles Seitz (Jul 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform Dexter Caldwell (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform Anand S Malwade (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform Erik Decker (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform Paul Keser (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform ClarkJK (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform Bradley, Stephen W. Mr. (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform Christopher Jones (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform Brian Epstein (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform Basgen, Brian (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform Erik Decker (Jul 24)
- Re: NitroSecurity SIEM platform ClarkJK (Jul 24)
