Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: Interface (was Firewall administration and thoughts)


From: Mark Teicher <mht () clark net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 09:46:07 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David,

OK, I tend to agree with you on some aspects of your GUI like form 
design, In GUI design (icons, rules, etc), or interface, not all 
operating systems and actions can be executed the same way.  Most of 
the current products account for this, or do not port to all 
platforms due to reasons listed in my comments above and your 
comments below.

The real trick to some of the neat GUI designs is to allow the user 
or the system administrator click a switch or screen detail on what 
the GUI or interface is actually 
installing/executing/removing/adding/changing from the system that is 
being worked on, also a good debugging tool, and sometimes with 
manual intervention, one can tweak the change just a hair to 
accomendate for those specials (i.e. smapd modifications, etc)

Event notifications are a different issue since it all depends what 
the company network/security policy dicates as a event or what the 
person in charge deems important.. This can be a whole new thread in 
itself.:)

/mht

At 08:31 AM 10/6/97 -0400, David Collier-Brown wrote:
Following on from the GUI and dangerous-ergonomics discussion,
I'd like to suggest that carefull throught can give a gui which
actually expresses what the security officer **wants** to know,
in terms of what he's asked for.

 A trivial example:  Imagine a forms-like interface where you
select services you wish to turn on (ie, the usual dumb thing).
Now turn it into a table, with the following columns:

   Service    Ports Opened      Risk
---+----------------------------+-------------------
X | Email   | smtp, 225/tcp   | Spam[1][2][3]
X | News    | nntp, 119/tcp   | Spam[2][3]
...
X | NFS v2  | sunrpc, 111/udp  | Spoofing[4][5]
  |         | portmapper      | 
  |         | mountd
  |         | nfsd             | eavesdroping[9]

With a bit of carefull collection of dependancies, one can
easily show the user that he just added spam-forwarding
(footnote [1]) when he turned on mail, by changing the
words ``Spam[1]'' to red....

With a bit more work, you can show cross-product effects:
turn on traceroute by opening a whole range of upriveleged ports
(on a certain vendors's implementation of traceroute) and all
of a sudden nfsd's ports are open, and ``eavesdropping[9]''
turns bright orange.


To summarize: a GUI designed from the point of view of a security 
officer would be good.

--dave (Note: one could write one as an analyzer, without
      it needing to be part of the firewall controls at all) c-b

-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | Always do right. This will gratify some 
people
185 Ellerslie Ave.,   | and astonish the rest.        -- Mark Twain
Willowdale, Ontario   | davecb () hobbes ss org, canada.sun.com
M2N 1Y3. 416-223-8968 | http://java.science.yorku.ca/~davecb


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNDjrne0580gyByN0EQJ7BQCgioRh1gMbkigmXbX3MWrobH9T0W8An19F
o6jTz8/Ugmg4blKmwtIbSt/P
=Fh7i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Current thread: