Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Say it ain't so
From: Neil Ratzlaff <Neil.Ratzlaff () ucop edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 15:23:38 -0700
I have no idea what they mean by "touched" except maybe in the head. I just installed the software, created the network objects and rules and various settings, and plugged the cables in to put my FW between the internal router and the internet. Worked fine (except for settings). Users did not even know it happened, nor did sysadmins. Neil -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- At 12:43 09/17/97 EST5EDT, you wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a meeting with our Firewall Installers on the 29th. Got
pulled into as a result of 'centralizing' our computer/technology
staff and creation of a helpdesk. The upshot is this. We have been
apprised by one of the staff (Originally selected
installation/Firewall) and was told that every device behind the
firewall would have to 'be touched' for anything to work. It almost
sounds like a complete rework of the network setup/standard. We were
told that all IP addresses would have to be changed. Somehow I get
the impression that this is the installers idea, and I'm not quite
willing to by into it. I feel that it should be possible to 'plug-in'
any properly configured firewall (with the exception of the proxies)
and not have to reconfigure machines.
Am I wrong?
Jim Leo
admin () everett pitt cc nc us
Current thread:
- Say it ain't so Jim Leo (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Erik Van Riper (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Neil Ratzlaff (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Colin Campbell (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Paul D. Robertson (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Rick Murphy (Sep 19)
- Re: Say it ain't so Paul D. Robertson (Sep 19)
- Re: Say it ain't so Carl Friedberg, carl () comets com (Sep 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Say it ain't so jim (Sep 18)
- RE: Say it ain't so Giesinger, Nick HE0 (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Sandeep_Talwar (Sep 18)
- RE: Say it ain't so Russ (Sep 19)
- Re: Say it Ain't So Jim Leo (Sep 19)
