Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Response to door knocking
From: Ulrich Flegel <Ulrich.Flegel () CS Uni-Dortmund DE>
Date: 01 Feb 1999 15:56:22 +0100
"Robert" == Robert Graham <robert_david_graham () yahoo com> writes:
Robert> Assuming that you take care of the obvious pathalogical
Robert> cases (be careful about false positives, IP spoofing, and
Robert> throttling the rate at which you send such messages,
Robert> etc.), are there any problems with this scheme?
You name them. Unmasking IP spoofing without cooperating
routers/sniffers upsream to the alleged agressor I don't see how you
want to discern real IPs from spoofed IPs. In worst case the attacker
uses you to attack someone else.
Just my 2 cents,
Ulrich Flegel
Current thread:
- Re: Response to door knocking Ulrich Flegel (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Response to door knocking Robert Graham (Feb 01)
- Re: Response to door knocking Paul D. Robertson (Feb 01)
- Re: Response to door knocking Paul D. Robertson (Feb 01)
- Re: Response to door knocking Amos Hayes (Feb 03)
- Re: Response to door knocking Chris Cappuccio (Feb 04)
- Re: Response to door knocking Paul D. Robertson (Feb 04)
- Re: Response to door knocking Amos Hayes (Feb 03)
- Re: Response to door knocking Damir Rajnovic (Feb 02)
- Re: Response to door knocking Robert Graham (Feb 03)
- Re: Response to door knocking Damir Rajnovic (Feb 04)
- Re: Response to door knocking Paul D. Robertson (Feb 04)
(Thread continues...)
