Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
NAT Pseudo Security
From: "Lee T. Christie" <Lee.Christie () mosaicinfo org>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 09:25:09 -0500
I was wondering what everyone's thoughts were utilizing NAT as your only security mechanism, for protection from the Internet. I realize that NAT was not designed for security purposes. For instance, if network A is connecting to the Internet behind a router performing NAT, no incoming address or port forwarding, what are my risks, from outside hosts? The way I see it by implementing a SOHO firewall I gain a) Ingress and Egress packet control b) Statefull inspection or proxy inspection c) A potentially hardened OS on the unit d) Logging and Reporting e) Secure management My question is how vulnerable would that network be from outside attacks? Is there anyway an outside user would be able to utilize source routing or another mechanism to attack an internally NAT'd host? Thanks in advance for your responses. Lee _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- NAT Pseudo Security Lee T. Christie (May 04)
- Re: NAT Pseudo Security Srini (May 04)
- Re: NAT Pseudo Security Mikael Olsson (May 04)
- RE: NAT Pseudo Security Ben Nagy (May 05)
- RE: NAT Pseudo Security Paul D. Robertson (May 05)
- RE: NAT Pseudo Security Frank Knobbe (May 05)
- RE: NAT Pseudo Security Paul D. Robertson (May 05)
- RE: NAT Pseudo Security David Lang (May 06)
- RE: NAT Pseudo Security Ben Nagy (May 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NAT Pseudo Security salgak (May 04)
- VPN testing utility lordchariot (May 04)
- Re: NAT Pseudo Security R. DuFresne (May 05)
