Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Application-level Attacks
From: Danny <nocmonkey () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:11:16 -0500
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:56:58 -0800, Crispin Cowan <crispin () immunix com> wrote:
Shimon Silberschlag wrote:Today, when attacks are shifting towards using the already open ports on the firewall, at the application level,It is often said that contemporary attacks are migrating to application-level attacks. Can someone point me to data backing this claim?
How do you define contemporary attacks? All attacks except for those at the application-level? ...D _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Application-level Attacks, (continued)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Devdas Bhagat (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Adam Shostack (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Devdas Bhagat (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Adam Shostack (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Frank Knobbe (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 29)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Adam Shostack (Jan 30)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Frederick M Avolio (Jan 30)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Adam Shostack (Jan 30)
- RE: Application-level Attacks Bill Royds (Jan 30)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Danny (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Crispin Cowan (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Paul D. Robertson (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 29)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Paul D. Robertson (Jan 29)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Dean A Weber (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks Dave Piscitello (Jan 28)
- Re: Application-level Attacks R. DuFresne (Jan 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Application-level Attacks Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 29)
- RE: Application-level Attacks Ben Nagy (Jan 28)
