Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Permissive Firewall Policy
From: "Anton Chuvakin" <anton () chuvakin org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:30:48 -0700
Any port between 1 and 65000 are known to be bad at least some of the time.
Holy cow! Is this for real? Somebody still asking a question like that?
It feels like a bit that would be posted to celebrate this list's 10th
anniversary or something :-)
But! I think for the outbound access the question borders on making
[some] sense. Yes, the general "block all that are not needed based on
the policy" is still there, but I almost feel that it makes sense to
spell out some of the *especially* ugly ports to watch, kind of like
telnet for inbound 10 years ago ... Or maybe not :-)
Best,
--
Anton Chuvakin, Ph.D., GCIA, GCIH, GCFA
http://www.chuvakin.org
http://chuvakin.blogspot.com
http://www.securitywarrior.com
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Permissive Firewall Policy Kevin Hinze (Sep 22)
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 23)
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy ArkanoiD (Sep 23)
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy Scott C. Kennedy (Sep 23)
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy Anton Chuvakin (Sep 25)
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy J. Oquendo (Sep 25)
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy Kevin (Sep 23)
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy Devdas Bhagat (Sep 23)
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy Tim Shea (Sep 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy Fetch, Brandon (Sep 23)
- Re: Permissive Firewall Policy Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 23)
