Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"?
From: "Nick Jacobsen" <nick () ethicsdesign com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:27:11 -0800
obviously, you didn't do your research... I consider Microsoft, C|net,
and KOMO (A Seattle ABC Affiliate) to be accurate news sources, or at
least as accurate as you can get... did you even consider trying to
google for news articles?
-----Original Message-----
From: sil
Sent: Thu 2/12/2004 4:20 PM
To: tlarholm () pivx com
Cc: ge () egotistical reprehensible net; bugtraq () securityfocus com;
full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] RE: W2K source "leaked"?
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 tlarholm () pivx com wrote:
> for Whistler (now Windows XP) had been leaked, though they
never
> confirmed it.
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,35135,00.html
>
> WinBeta is also reporting on the new leak
>
>
http://www.winbeta.org/winbeta/forums/index.php?showtopic=2663&st=0&#ent
<http://www.winbeta.org/winbeta/forums/index.php?showtopic=2663&st=0&#en
t>
> ry9449
>
> 0-day exploits being used on Microsofts network, foul play by
privileged
> partners or a hoax? Let's see what Microsoft reports.
Personally I believe you've answered you're curiousities,
questions, ^*,
for yourself, and for everyone else. While I don't intend on
knocking
'Neowin', but I'm sure if something held substantially here,
news agencies
all over the world would have covered this situation forming.
Outside of
the posts on 'forums' there is nothing more than talk. Think
digital Elvis
sightings here: I've seen, I've heard, someone who knows someone
who knows
someone /$/*, ...
I wrote a doc a while back on the dangers of forging information
called
Breaking Point, and although it was not PhD type material, this
is an
exact situation I described here. What's say I wanted to make
money on the
stock market, say shorting Microsoft. Get the picture? Unless
some
CONCRETE information comes of it, anyone who pays attention to
these
rumors are doing nothing more than adding fuel to the fire.
"BREAKING POINT: FORGING CHAOS AND DESTRUCTION ONLINE"
http://www.politrix.org/segment/bpoint.html
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Privacy in the US? Tell me another great story!
http://www.politrix.org/segment/opinbast.html
"The most tyrannical of governments are those which make
crimes of opinions, for everyone has an inalienable
right to his thoughts." -- Benedict Spinoza
J. Oquendo //sil
http://www.kungfunix.net http://www.politrix.org
http://www.infiltrated.net http://bush.shafted.us
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
<<winmail.dat>>
Current thread:
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"?, (continued)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? webheadport80 (Feb 12)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Georgi Guninski (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? cdowns (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Bernie, CTA (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? ypwhich (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? madsaxon (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Georgi Guninski (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Sebastian Dietz (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? webheadport80 (Feb 12)
- RE: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Otero, Hernan (EDS) (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? John . Airey (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Nick Jacobsen (Feb 13)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? SMORRIS (Feb 13)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? Drew Copley (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Schmehl, Paul L (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Tobias Weisserth (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Paul Schmehl (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Tobias Weisserth (Feb 13)
- RE: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Nick FitzGerald (Feb 14)
