funsec mailing list archives
Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:10:19 -0500
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:55:12 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
It seems to me that Heisenberg is assuming that we will always use invasive technology to measure particle movement and velocity, but if we develop a passive way of measuring the momentum and positions, then wouldnt we be able to know both at the same time?
Describe how you measure *both* passively. For that matter, describe how you measure either one passively - having done that, you can then use an active means to measure the other. (Of course, by the time you reach a Zen-enough mindset that you can measure either one without measuring it, you won't care what value either measurement was, and the fact that you get answers without asking the question won't bother you in the slightest.. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno?, (continued)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 23)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Barrie Dempster (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Drsolly (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Drsolly (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Dude VanWinkle (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? der Mouse (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? der Mouse (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 23)
- Re: Duh - Chaining Zeno? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
