Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:12:44 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:44:15 -0600 or thereabouts David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote: ...snip...
That is true, but if the Linux hosts finish faster (for whatever reason) and then the Windows hosts have to finish scanning at a slower rate, that will bring the overall average down. If you run with -d and use the run-time interaction feature by hitting Enter during a scan, you can see a live estimate of the current scanning rate. You might see it really fast at the beginning and slow down at the end.I'm happy to try any patch, Nmap command, or network size (up to when Nmap runs out of memory at around /17) so feel free to ask or patch away.Would you run the tests again with "--max-retries 0"? That will eliminate the doAnyOutstandingRetransmits slowdown. David Fifield
Here we go again, this time with --max-retries 0 like so: nmap --min-rate 100000 --min-hostgroup 256 --max-retries 0 -P0 -n -d -v -p- <targets> These are all local machines. Multiple scans against other machines were consistent with these so I've only included these three scans: Linux Box: Overall sending rates: 89643.44 packets / s, 3944311.23 bytes / s. Final times for host: srtt: 165 rttvar: 2 to: 100000 Windows Box: Overall sending rates: 18712.29 packets / s, 823340.93 bytes / s. Overall sending rates: 18712.29 packets / s, 823340.93 bytes / s. Nothing: Overall sending rates: 14538.09 packets / s, 639675.90 bytes / s. Final times for host: srtt: -1 rttvar: -1 to: 1000000 Local /25: Overall sending rates: 15573.42 packets / s, 685230.30 bytes / s. doAnyOutstandingRetransmits was certainly a factor. It seems something else though is taking up most of the time. I can probably profile this and send along the binary/gmon.out if these results don't make sense. Brandon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH8GTFqaGPzAsl94IRAgGEAKDF7v7j3MSaiIc6gAU1jeqBUgx3FgCfaMdJ 9Adk70k0hwR8mJZNW5vVI/Y= =IFI3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 25)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Razi Shaban (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Razi Shaban (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Brandon Enright (Mar 26)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 30)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Brandon Enright (Mar 30)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 31)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning David Fifield (Mar 30)
- Re: New option: --min-rate for minimum-rate scanning Razi Shaban (Mar 26)
