Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: RE: Legality of WEP Cracking
From: "Erin Carroll" <amoeba () amoebazone com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:33:34 -0700
This, and other responses in the same vein, are spot on. Don't do it. It's opening more liability and cost to your company than the potential revenue you could generate. On the other hand, I don't see the problem with contacting said company (no cracking on your end) and telling them you noticed they are using wireless and WEP (anyone in range can) and explaining the dangers of relying on such an easily broken protocol as your sales-pitch-ish way in. Then again, I avoid the sales aspect of this business like the plague where possible so no idea if this would even garner a non-hostile response.
-----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of ebk_lists () hotmail com Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 12:00 PM To: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: Re: RE: Legality of WEP Cracking It's a question of the laws of the country you are in, for sure. But overall I think that by actively cracking the wep or wpa or whatever encryption, you are treading on thin ice, if not breaking the law altogether. My brief google didn't reveal any specific examples, but based on what I already have learned about the law and how it applies (at least in the US), I would say that eavesdropping on UNENCRYPTED wireless communications is ok. By failing to use encryption, the people are, as you say, giving up their expectation of privacy. Especially given the fact that wireless communications are a bit ubiquitous due to their nature. However, the line gets drawn once they are using encryption. They have taken a step to provide a measure of privacy (even while using something as broken as wep) and by actively trying to surpass that, I think you may be in a bit of danger. Although I don't know for sure. Hopefully someone else can give us more legal reference. Regardless, this is a bad idea and I would highly recommend NOT doing this for/against anyone that isn't paying you and has given you a sign "get out of jail" letter. You have rightly dismissed this one. -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat? Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic See HOW Now with our 20/20 program! http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020 -------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat? Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic See HOW Now with our 20/20 program! http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking, (continued)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Carl Livitt (May 20)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Justin Ferguson (May 21)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking George Dragusin (May 18)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Chris Travers (May 19)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking John Mason Jr (May 21)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Paul Dickens (May 23)
- RE: Legality of WEP Cracking Richard Brinson (May 23)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Nick Selby (May 27)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Nicholas Chapel (May 23)
- RE: Legality of WEP Cracking Richard Brinson (May 23)
- Re: RE: Legality of WEP Cracking ebk_lists (May 18)
- RE: RE: Legality of WEP Cracking Erin Carroll (May 18)
- RE:Legality of WEP cracking scott (May 18)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Matthew Webster (May 18)
- Re: Re: Legality of WEP Cracking cwright (May 18)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Chris Travers (May 19)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Bob Radvanovsky (May 19)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Justin Ferguson (May 20)
- Re: Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Matthew Webster (May 19)
- Re: Re: Re: Legality of WEP Cracking ebk_lists (May 19)
- Re: Re: Re: Legality of WEP Cracking Justin Ferguson (May 20)
- Re: Legality of WEP Cracking cwright (May 20)
