Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Napster a little insecure?
From: whitevampire () MINDLESS COM (WHiTe VaMPiRe)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:18:26 -0500
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 03:52:20PM +0100, Thomas Maschutznig wrote:
: There _IS_ some kind of check, which files are being sent..
: I've heard of three actually
: (dont take this as 100% sure.. PLEASE)
Perhaps this is a little excessive, as this thread is start to reiterate, but Jordan already said that Napster
checked for the MPEG headers in
every file beginning the transfer.
Regards,
--
__ ______ ____
/ \ / \ \ / / WHiTe VaMPiRe\Rem
\ \/\/ /\ Y / whitevampire () mindless com
\ / \ / http://www.gammaforce.org/
\__/\ / \___/ http://www.projectgamma.com/
\/ "Silly hacker, root is for administrators."
<HR NOSHADE>
<UL>
<LI>application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
</UL>
Current thread:
- Napster a little insecure? Dennis Miller (Jan 27)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Gunes Sen (Jan 27)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Jordan Ritter (Jan 28)
- IIS4.0 .htw vulnerability Fricke, Gregory D. (Jan 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Thiago Mello (Jan 28)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Sebastian (Jan 29)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? technot (Jan 29)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Thomas Maschutznig (Jan 29)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Mark Shirley (Jan 30)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? WHiTe VaMPiRe (Jan 30)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Jordan Ritter (Jan 30)
- Re: Napster a little insecure? Maniac . (Jan 30)
