Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

ICQ >= 99* + CC Data (Was: Re: Administrivia #4883)


From: Ken.Williams () EY COM (Ken Williams)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:06:46 -0600


I agree that it sounds very unlikely, but one of the reports came from a respected security software developer (who is 
now MIA, unavailable).

Here is the only additional info I have:

- All reports involved ICQ for Windows 95/98/NT4
- Attempts to snag Credit Card data only noticed/picked up by firewall and/or proxy when ICQ was initially started for 
the first time after ICQ client installation

- kw

p.s.  If you're going to be at RSA2000, then feel free to contact me (ken.williams () ey com) for a cup of coffee.

BlueBoar () thievco com on 01/16/2000 12:17:40 AM

To:     Ken Williams/AABS/EYLLP/US@EY-NAmerica, vuln-dev () securityfocus com@Internet
cc:     
Subject:        Re: Administrivia #4883

Ken Williams wrote:

i have received reports that ICQ 99* and later surreptitiously snag
credit card data from your HD and send it to Mirabilis, without any
notification or confirmation.  these reports are unsubstantiated - based
on the report sources though, this is worth looking into.

That sounds terribly unlikely.  There's no universal spot where credit
card numbers are stored on Windows machines.  Does the rumor include
a particular app that is targeted?

                                        BB

*******************************************************************************
Note:          The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from 
disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for 
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.  Thank you.  Ernst & Young LLP
*******************************************************************************


Current thread: