Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
ICQ >= 99* + CC Data (Was: Re: Administrivia #4883)
From: Ken.Williams () EY COM (Ken Williams)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:06:46 -0600
I agree that it sounds very unlikely, but one of the reports came from a respected security software developer (who is now MIA, unavailable). Here is the only additional info I have: - All reports involved ICQ for Windows 95/98/NT4 - Attempts to snag Credit Card data only noticed/picked up by firewall and/or proxy when ICQ was initially started for the first time after ICQ client installation - kw p.s. If you're going to be at RSA2000, then feel free to contact me (ken.williams () ey com) for a cup of coffee. BlueBoar () thievco com on 01/16/2000 12:17:40 AM To: Ken Williams/AABS/EYLLP/US@EY-NAmerica, vuln-dev () securityfocus com@Internet cc: Subject: Re: Administrivia #4883 Ken Williams wrote:
i have received reports that ICQ 99* and later surreptitiously snag credit card data from your HD and send it to Mirabilis, without any notification or confirmation. these reports are unsubstantiated - based on the report sources though, this is worth looking into.
That sounds terribly unlikely. There's no universal spot where credit
card numbers are stored on Windows machines. Does the rumor include
a particular app that is targeted?
BB
*******************************************************************************
Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from
disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Ernst & Young LLP
*******************************************************************************
Current thread:
- Re: Administrivia #4883, (continued)
- Re: Administrivia #4883 Travis Siegel (Jan 13)
- [Fwd: Administrivia #4883] Blue Boar (Jan 13)
- Firewall-1 Logging *Issue* Mike Frantzen (Jan 13)
- Re: Firewall-1 Logging *Issue* Blue Boar (Jan 13)
- Re: Administrivia #4883 nascheme () ENME UCALGARY CA (Jan 14)
- Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Bennett Todd (Jan 14)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Marco Walther (Jan 14)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Bennett Todd (Jan 14)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Liviu Daia (Jan 14)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) spin0ff (Jan 16)
- ICQ >= 99* + CC Data (Was: Re: Administrivia #4883) Ken Williams (Jan 16)
- Re: ICQ >= 99* + CC Data Vanja Hrustic (Jan 16)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Liviu Daia (Jan 16)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Valery Dachev (Jan 17)
- Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Bennett Todd (Jan 14)
- Netdetect.exe with backdoor? (ICQ) WolF Knox (Jan 15)
- Re: Netdetect.exe with backdoor? (ICQ) Brad Griffin (Jan 15)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Iván Arce (Jan 14)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) kay (Jan 15)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Brian Masney (Jan 16)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) K Martin (Jan 16)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Paul Cardon (Jan 16)
