nanog mailing list archives
Re: FYI - unproven technology
From: Sean Doran <smd () tiny sprintlink net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 1994 17:51:31 -0400
In message <9410192004.AA11557 () pele psc edu>, "Matt Mathis" writes:
| I sincerely hope the numbers were 0.25% and 0.40%....
No, the losses were 40% (40/100) and 15% (15/100) respectively. :-(
| >Those of you without Ciscos will have to come up with a similar hack
| >somehow.
| You mean mae-east is requiring custom, substandard, ethernet implementations?
No, just that MFS is using a box with a chipset which doesn't
comply with IEEE 802.3 specs for interpacket-delay. This is still
a very very very bad and serious problem, though.
Sean.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- FYI - unproven technology Curtis Villamizar (Oct 19)
- Re: FYI - unproven technology Matt Mathis (Oct 19)
- Re: FYI - unproven technology Sean Doran (Oct 19)
- Re: FYI - unproven technology David R Conrad (Oct 19)
- Re: FYI - unproven technology Sean Doran (Oct 19)
- Re: FYI - unproven technology Ken Latta (Oct 19)
- Re: FYI - unproven technology bmanning (Oct 19)
- Re: FYI - unproven technology Matt Mathis (Oct 19)
