nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR FAQ
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 95 06:16:24 PDT
Simon,
With other words, we don't even know if the I-D in question is fixing the right problem.
The "I-D in question" addresses the incompatibility between CIDR and the notion of "address ownership". This incompatibility is *fundamental*. Ignoring it (or pretending that it does not exist) does not make the incompatibility less fundamental. Yakov.
Current thread:
- Re: CIDR FAQ, (continued)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul A Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Nathan Stratton (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul A Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Simon Poole (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Simon Poole (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Curtis Villamizar (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Tony Li (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 17)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Simon Poole (Aug 16)
- Message not available
- Re: CIDR FAQ Eliot Lear (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Arnold Nipper (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Paul A Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Yakov Rekhter (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: CIDR FAQ Randy Bush (Aug 16)
