nanog mailing list archives

Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers

From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 14:21:56 -0400

At 10:48 AM 5/2/96 -0400, Marten Terpstra wrote:


But the question is whether there will be more NBMA type NAPs in the
future. Point to MultiPoint for BGP, I like it ;-)


Marten, you are one sick puppy. ;-)

- paul


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Current thread:

Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Stephen Wolff (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Justin W. Newton (May 01)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Andrew Partan (May 01)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Erik E. Fair (May 01)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Andrew Partan (May 01)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Avi Freedman (May 02)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Jessica Yu (May 02)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Marten Terpstra (May 02)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Curtis Villamizar (May 06)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Paul Ferguson (May 02)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Steven J. Richardson (May 02)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers David . Kessens (May 03)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Paul Ferguson (May 02)