nanog mailing list archives
Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol () nacs net>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 14:54:02 -0500
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 12:18:51PM -0500, Dean Robb wrote:
At 13:06 11/30/98 -0500, you wrote:BBBZZZTTT yourself. Blocking email is an interception under the ECPA (18 USC 2511 et al). It has been reported here previously that*Sigh*...again with the misquoting of the law. First READ the law in question, then supply a Court opinion that blocking is interception (since it's the courts that interpret the law) if you still disagree.
Dean^2, This exact discussion has played out at least once or twice before on NANOG. Please go read the archives. I think at this point, no matter who is right, the argument is a waste of bandwidth. Both of you are receiving two-minute penalties. Go sit in the penalty box and chill. :> -- Steve Sobol [sjsobol () nacs net] Part-time Support Droid [support () nacs net] NACS Spaminator [abuse () nacs net] Spotted on a bumper sticker: "Possum. The other white meat."
Current thread:
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Dean Robb (Dec 01)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Steven J. Sobol (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Dean Anderson (Dec 01)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Dean Robb (Dec 01)
