nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU of the Internet?
From: Jeff Stehman <stehman () southwind net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 10:35:26 -0600
On Wed, Feb 04, 1998 at 01:18:56PM -0500, Dennis Simpson wrote:
We recommend that clients who care about interactive response use small MTUs, and clients who care about download speed use higher MTUs.
There's an extremely annoying potential gotcha in having clients set lower MTUs. At least one release of Netscape's web server set the Don't Fragment bit. In the few cases we've seen, if there was not a 1500 MTU pipe between server and client, the server could be reached, but no HTML would be downloaded. Usually it's easier to work around the problem on the client end than convince the server admins they might want change things on their end. -- Jeff Stehman Senior Systems Administrator stehman () southwind net SouthWind Internet Access, Inc. voice: (316)263-7963 Wichita, KS
Current thread:
- Re: MTU of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Scott Whyte (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Steve Carter (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 05)
- The 'tude [Was MTU of the Internet?] Steve Carter (Feb 05)
- Re: The 'tude [Was MTU of the Internet?] Perry E. Metzger (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jeff Stehman (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Marc Slemko (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Kevin A. Smith (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Marc Slemko (Feb 04)
