nanog mailing list archives
Re: Exodus Customer Security
From: Jon Green <jcgreen () netins net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:41:38 -0600
Every post I see from you has something to do with what's wrong with Exodus. Why is that? -Jon On Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:43:19 -0500 (EST), asr () millburn net writes:
FYI-
"There was something with one of our customers, however it was a customer
machine, and as such, we aren't at liberty to discuss the issue unless
they specifically allow us to."
- quoth Exodus
So, in other words, they can't discuss abuse issues with the victim,
unless the *offender* (client) gives them permission to?
I'll sleep much better tonight knowing this.
Current thread:
- Exodus Customer Security Adam Rothschild (Nov 17)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Jon Green (Nov 17)
- What's wrong with Exodus? Adam Rothschild (Nov 17)
- Re: What's wrong with Exodus? Jon Green (Nov 17)
- Re: What's wrong with Exodus? Adam Rothschild (Nov 17)
- Re: What's wrong with Exodus? TTSG (Nov 18)
- What's wrong with Exodus? Adam Rothschild (Nov 17)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Jon Green (Nov 17)
- Unix trioyans and Customer Security alex (Nov 17)
- Re: Unix troyans and Customer Security Henry Linneweh (Nov 17)
- Re: Unix trioyans and Customer Security alex (Nov 18)
- Re: Unix trioyans and Customer Security Steve Noble (Nov 18)
- Re: Exodus Customer Security Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
