nanog mailing list archives
Re: WARNING: AOL is hosed (again)
From: Blake Willis <blakew () cais net>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 17:12:12 -0400 (EDT)
Of course, these measures can only help but so much if your hostmaster blindly acks every peice of NIC mail that comes his way... --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blake Willis 703-448-4470x483 Network Engineer, New Customers blakew () cais net CAIS Internet, a CGX Communications Company --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Phillip Vandry wrote:
If yes to my second question, then the tracking numbers either need to be made much longer and randomized or a one time pass phrase (session key) needs to be added to the acknowlegement form.You can actually set a domain name so that it cannot be changed, by any template, by any modification, correct guardian or NOT.Sounds like a nonreversible setting to me. What if you need to change it? Anyway, I think that by default, the update goes through automatically, a positive acknoledgement is ignored (default behaviour) and a negative acknowledgement is honored. (Which means AOL should have been able to stop it). Then there is the setting where the update will not go through by default, and a positive acknowledgement is required. As to whether it all works as advertized (and PGP auth too?), who knows? -Phil
Current thread:
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jeremy Porter (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jeremy Porter (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jeremy Porter (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? J.D. Falk (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Aaron Goldblatt (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev (Sep 30)
