nanog mailing list archives

Re: WARNING: AOL is hosed (again)


From: Blake Willis <blakew () cais net>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 17:12:12 -0400 (EDT)

Of course, these measures can only help but so much if your hostmaster
blindly acks every peice of NIC mail that comes his way... 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blake Willis                                            703-448-4470x483
Network Engineer, New Customers                         blakew () cais net
CAIS Internet, a CGX Communications Company
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Phillip Vandry wrote:

If yes to my second question, then the tracking numbers either need to be
made much longer and randomized or a one time pass phrase (session key) 
needs to be added to the acknowlegement form. 

You can actually set a domain name so that it cannot be changed, by
any template, by any modification, correct guardian or NOT.

Sounds like a nonreversible setting to me. What if you need to change it?

Anyway, I think that by default, the update goes through automatically,
a positive acknoledgement is ignored (default behaviour) and a negative
acknowledgement is honored. (Which means AOL should have been able to
stop it).

Then there is the setting where the update will not go through by default,
and a positive acknowledgement is required.

As to whether it all works as advertized (and PGP auth too?), who knows?

-Phil




Current thread: