nanog mailing list archives
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:47:50 -0400
At 09:27 PM 04/03/2000 -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
surprised not to see this mentioned on NANOG >Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 >To: Notify >Subject: Exodus Customer Confidential Communication >
Gordon, Does the word "confidential" elude you? - paul
Current thread:
- peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Gordon Cook (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Alex Rubenstein (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Alex Rubenstein (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Gordon Cook (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Majdi S. Abbas (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Gordon Cook (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Ryan Tucker (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Bill Woodcock (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Alex Rubenstein (Apr 03)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus William Allen Simpson (Apr 04)
- Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
