nanog mailing list archives
HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson () greendragon com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:10:35 -0400
"To exempt from reciprocal compensation requirements telecommunications
traffic to the Internet. "
Anybody know about this? Seems like it kills payments by ILECS to CLECs
for dialups, when the calls are to an ISP. Note, only _TO_ an ISP;
folks wanting to provide voice are still required to pay ILECs for
traffic _from_ an ISP.
Is this the "ILECs put ISPs out of business" act?
`(A) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding subsection (b)(5), after the date of
enactment of this paragraph, no local exchange carrier shall be
required to make any payment for the transport or termination of
telecommunications to the Internet or any provider of Internet access
service.
`(B) JURISDICTION- Such transport or termination shall be considered
interstate communications and subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of
the Commission.
WSimpson () UMich edu
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Current thread:
- HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation William Allen Simpson (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Jeff Mcadams (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation David Lesher (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation M. David Leonard (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation M. David Leonard (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Bill Woodcock (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Nathan Stratton (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Masataka Ohta (Sep 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Chip Sharp (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation David Lesher (Sep 14)
(Thread continues...)
