nanog mailing list archives
Re: netscan.org update
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 14:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
It's sounding like what we're working our way around to is that two
separate BGP feeds would be needed:
1) One with an announcement of all of the /32s which are broadcast
addresses of amplifier networks, so that operators can route traffic
_destined_ for those /32s to Null0.
2) Another with an announcement of all of the whole blocks of amplifier
addresses, so that operators who choose to can create policy-routes which
specify that traffic _originating_ from those addresses (and which are
_also_ ICMP echo-replies, perhaps) gets policy routed to Null0.
I'd guess that feed #1 would be an easy sell, and that many fewer people
would use feed #2 as well, but both seem like good ideas.
-Bill
Current thread:
- netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update Patrick Greenwell (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update John Fraizer (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update Greg A. Woods (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Bill Fumerola (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Patrick Greenwell (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update James A. T. Rice (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update James A. T. Rice (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Bill Woodcock (Sep 24)
- Message not available
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update John Fraizer (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Patrick Greenwell (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update dies (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Jason Slagle (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update John Fraizer (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update Henry R. Linneweh (Sep 26)
- Re: netscan.org update Daniel Senie (Sep 26)
