Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?

[mike harrison <meuon () highertech net>]

> > of unadministered, always-on boxes that aren't supposed to be running
> > inbound services in unrouted space would save all of us headaches.
>
> That's almost a better justification for NAT than address-space conservation. ;)

Almost? I'd say it's hands down an EXCELLENT reason. In some configs
though, the NAT'd people can still see each other and cause problems, 
but it still cuts down the exposure.