nanog mailing list archives
Re: what's that smell?
From: "John M. Brown" <john () chagresventures com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:51:32 -0700
Those are reasons against. We in the technical community need to develop or modify our tools to make those tasks easier. Hire a lazy but smart admin! :) On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:45:22PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Jason Lixfeld wrote:In more cases than not, especially now adays with lots of networks peering all over gods creation, RPF can have some pretty detrimental effects if your routing is somewhat asymmetrical.actually RPF is extremely effective especially where its highly asymmetrical, eg at the edge. theres virtually no reason not to RPF dialup/isdn/cable/dsl/etc customers for example.Sure, but to RPF so many customer facing edge ports in comparison to the far fewer number of egress ports makes the implementation procedure quite extensive. The more configuration, the more room for errors or "oops, forgot to configure that there", not to mention change management.
Current thread:
- Economic Justification / Rationale for MPLS Shannon Lake (Oct 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Economic Justification / Rationale for MPLS Matt Ryan (Oct 01)
