nanog mailing list archives

Re: uunet


From: Jeff Wasilko <jeffw () smoe org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:34:55 -0500


On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 10:26:16PM +0000, Tim Thorne wrote:

"Dave Howe" <DaveHowe () gmx co uk> wrote:

there then followed a short conversation that amounted to that - given that
$mydomain was working fine, they would *not* look at the problem for
$contractorsdomain unless $contractor contacted them about it.  I found
postmaster@contractorsdomain worked fine, so managed to get *that* guy to
get uunet to fix the problem (and it was literally a thirty second fix).

You can hardly expect an ISP to change an MX record on the opinion
(right or wrong) of a third party. It could be someone trying a little

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the original poster wasn't trying to
get UUnet to change an MX record.

Rather, the uunet-provided MX host for the domain was not set up
to 'relay' mail for that domain, and the original poster was
trying to get UUnet to fix their MTA config.

-j


Current thread: