nanog mailing list archives

Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks

From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy () knowtion net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:33:28 +0100


Neil J. McRae wrote:

The problem - to try to steer this bus back onto topic - is the
sheer amount of self-policing that the powers-that-want-to-be want
us to do. Or it becomes our fault.


Who should do the policing then Peter?


The police ?

Current thread:

Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Sean Donelan (Jun 13)
- Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Richard Irving (Jun 13)
  - Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Eric A. Hall (Jun 13)
  - Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 14)
    - Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Peter Galbavy (Jun 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks sgorman1 (Jun 13)
- RE: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks McBurnett, Jim (Jun 14)
  - RE: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Charles Sprickman (Jun 14)
- Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Neil J. McRae (Jun 16)
  - Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Peter Galbavy (Jun 16)
    - Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Sean Donelan (Jun 16)
    - Re: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks Peter Galbavy (Jun 16)