nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign Responds
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:51:43 -0500
Paul Vixie wrote:
It's still to be seen if ISC's cure is worse than the disease; as instead of detecting and stoping wildcard sets, it looks for delegation.that's because wildcard ("synthesized") responses do not look different on the wire, and looking for a specific A RR that can be changed every day or even loadbalanced through four /16's that may have real hosts in them seems like the wrong way forward.
See the NANOG archives for my post reguarding wildcard caching and set comparison with additional resolver functionality for requesting if the resolver wishes to receive wildcards or NXDOMAIN.
-Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign Responds, (continued)
- Re: Verisign Responds Andy Walden (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Kee Hinckley (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dave Crocker (Sep 25)
- Re: Verisign Responds Randy Bush (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Eliot Lear (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Dave Crocker (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jim Segrave (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Eliot Lear (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 23)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Paul Vixie (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Jack Bates (Sep 24)
- Re: Verisign Responds Wayne E. Bouchard (Sep 24)
