nanog mailing list archives
Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:55:14 +0300
Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
So are you saying that managed security services are not avaialble for paying consumers in USA?We owe to our customers, and we owe it to ourselves, so let's just stop finding excise to side-step the issue.
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden, (continued)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden James Baldwin (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Andy Johnson (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 30)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Robert M. Enger (Apr 30)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden william(at)elan.net (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Newton (Apr 26)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Apr 27)
