nanog mailing list archives
Re: Two Tiered Internet
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:00:50 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Tony Li wrote:
Because they're telephone companies.
Oh, that's right. I forgot. They're evil.
Because they can't manufacture bandwidth that isn't there. Cable co's provide broadband with a fraction of the loop capacity. For telco's to offer premium service, they have to take from the aggregate capacity. It's a zero sum game, and for the telco's to get more, the subscribers get less.
I guess you missed all those trenches being dug in Verizon land to install fiber to the home. I guess you missed all the network upgrades in ATT/SBC and Bellsouth land to shorten their copper loop distances. Sounds like they are manufacturing more bandwidth and the zero sum game is getting bigger.
Current thread:
- Re: Two Tiered Internet, (continued)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Marshall Eubanks (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Steve Gibbard (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Michael . Dillon (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet David Barak (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Per Heldal (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Michael . Dillon (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Bob Snyder (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Tony Li (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Tony Li (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Jeff McAdams (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Edward B. Dreger (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Jared Mauch (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Joe Shen (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Two Tiered Internet John Dupuy (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
