nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email
From: Patrick Muldoon <doon () inoc net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 22:47:48 -0400
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 4:00 PM -0400 2005-07-05, Jim Popovitch wrote:However, is seems the problem is over on the secondary MX (Postfix) which only has a list of legit relay domains for pMX. When pMX is back online sMX fwds it's queue, but at that point pMX rejects to sMX...who then rejects to Sender.Yup, and a lot of spammers take advantage of this fact by directly connecting to the secondary MXes of their targets, and never connecting to the primary MXes.
What about setting your highest order MX and lowest order MX to point to the same set of mail servers, and hide your backup servers in the middle. Even better if you can implement something that auto blacklists people that connect to your "secondary" MX's when you know that your primaries are up and accepting e-mail.
-Patrick
Current thread:
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email, (continued)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Daniel Senie (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Todd Vierling (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email David Andersen (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Joe Maimon (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Patrick Muldoon (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Simon Lyall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Eric A. Hall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Piotr KUCHARSKI (Jul 08)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 06)
