nanog mailing list archives
Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)
From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy () center osis gov>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 18:20:04 -0400
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:24:22PM +0100, Sean Doran wrote:
On 7 Jul, 2005, at 21:10, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:Real firewalls pass inbound traffic because a state table entry exists. NATs do the same thing, with nasty side-effects. There is no added security from the header-mangling.To which Len Bosak quipped a few years ago: "If you don't know its name, you can't curse it".
Sure you can. For a human entity, get a few hairs from its head or nail clippings. For a network entity, get the bits of its externally visible IP address. -- Joe Yao ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.
Current thread:
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008), (continued)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Fred Baker (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Crist Clark (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Sean Doran (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Sean Doran (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) David Andersen (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Daniel Senie (Jul 09)
- RE: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Tony Hain (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 07)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Sean Doran (Jul 08)
- Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008) Joseph S D Yao (Jul 08)
