nanog mailing list archives
Re: YouTube IP Hijacking
From: Ravi Pina <ravi () cow org>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:53:33 -0500
Sounds more like a typo on a filter over at AS17557 than anything else. http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/afp/080224/world/denmark_media_islam_pakistan_internet_youtube -r On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:27:29PM -0800, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
As you guys probably know Youtube's IP's are being hijacked. Trace:
~ $ host youtube.com
youtube.com has address 208.65.153.253
youtube.com has address 208.65.153.238
youtube.com has address 208.65.153.251
[Same /24]
701 3491 17557
64.74.137.253 (metric 1) from 66.151.144.148 (66.151.144.148)
Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 100, valid, external
Community: 65010:300
Last update: Sun Feb 24 11:33:05 2008 [PST8PDT]
3491 17557
216.218.135.205 from 216.218.135.205 (216.218.252.164)
Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 100, valid, external, best
Last update: Sun Feb 24 10:47:57 2008 [PST8PDT]
So, it seems that youtube's ip block has been hijacked by a more
specific prefix being advertised. This is a case of IP hijacking, not
case of DNS poisoning, youtube engineers doing something stupid, etc.
For people that don't know. The router will try to get the most specific
prefix. This is by design, not by accident. This is a case of censorship
on the internet. Anyways, I hope this doesn't get into a political
situation, and someone stops this.
What action are you going to take? Are you going to filter
announcements from AS17557, or just filter that specific announcement?
Considering youtube is a fairly high-traffic website I think that other
operators are just going to start filtering that AS. This is a great
example of global politics getting in the way of honest corporatism.
This is also an example of how vulnerable the internet is, and how lax
providers are in their filtering policies. I don't know how large
Pakistani Telecom is, but it I bet its not large enough that PCCW should
be allowing it to advertise anything.
Current thread:
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking, (continued)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Neil Fenemor (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Will Hargrave (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Martin Hannigan (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Jim Mercer (Feb 25)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Alexander Harrowell (Feb 25)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Jim Mercer (Feb 25)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 24)
- RE: YouTube IP Hijacking John van Oppen (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Max Tulyev (Feb 24)
- Re: YouTube IP Hijacking Jim Popovitch (Feb 24)
- ISP's who where affected by the misconfiguration: start using IRR and checking your BGP updates (Was: YouTube IP Hijacking) Jeroen Massar (Feb 24)
- Re: ISP's who where affected by the misconfiguration: start using IRR and checking your BGP updates (Was: YouTube IP Hijacking) Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 24)
- Re: ISP's who where affected by the misconfiguration: start using IRR and checking your BGP updates (Was: YouTube IP Hijacking) Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Re: ISP's who where affected by the misconfiguration: start using IRR and checking your BGP updates (Was: YouTube IP Hijacking) Jon Lewis (Feb 25)
- Re: ISP's who where affected by the misconfiguration: start using IRR and checking your BGP updates (Was: YouTube IP Hijacking) Ross Vandegrift (Feb 25)
- Re: ISP's who where affected by the misconfiguration: start using IRR and checking your BGP updates sthaug (Feb 25)
- Re: ISP's who where affected by the misconfiguration: start using IRR and checking your BGP updates Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 26)
