nanog mailing list archives
Re: On the subject of multihoming
From: Colin Alston <karnaugh () karnaugh za net>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:47:18 +0200
On 2008/11/04 10:32 PM Charles Wyble wrote:
Obviously as they are consumer connections, I wouldn't get a BGP feed so would need to download a copy, which has the risk of stale data. Perhaps some sort of multihop BGP setup?I have done some research and found a lot of references to small site multihoming without BGP for link redundancy but not for traffic engineering.
I've played with that before. Essentially just EBGP Multi-hop with next-hop rewrites on various community prefixes. Of course I had access to a donor feed, that is probably the largest hurdle.
There is good use in general for a public no-distribute feed but I have yet to find such a thing. Is there a reason for that, or could I bribe my datacenter to give me a feed and then create my own public server with some el-cheapo Quagga and a bag of rainbows for hope?
Current thread:
- On the subject of multihoming Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: On the subject of multihoming Colin Alston (Nov 04)
- Re: On the subject of multihoming Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: On the subject of multihoming Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: On the subject of multihoming Matthew Petach (Nov 04)
- Re: On the subject of multihoming Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- RE: On the subject of multihoming Tomas L. Byrnes (Nov 04)
- Re: On the subject of multihoming kb3ien+nanog (Nov 06)
- Re: On the subject of multihoming Scott Doty (Nov 12)
- Re: On the subject of multihoming Murtaza (Nov 12)
- Re: On the subject of multihoming Colin Alston (Nov 04)
