nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:37:23 -0600
On 19 nov 2008, at 9:27, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
My gripe was that I wanted to get an IPv6 allocation from RIPE to start testing how IPv6 would fit in the company that I work for and build a dual stack network so that when the time comes, just switch on IPv6 BGP neighbors and update the DNS.
But at almost 10.000 EUR per year it's an experiment I can't afford.
You don't need PI for most things. You certainly don't need it to experiment.
Current thread:
- NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length michael.dillon (Nov 14)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 14)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Tim Durack (Nov 18)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Crist Clark (Nov 18)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Tim Durack (Nov 18)
- RE: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length michael.dillon (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Joe Abley (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 19)
- RE: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length michael.dillon (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 22)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Tim Durack (Nov 18)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Leo Vegoda (Nov 19)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 14)
- Re: NAT66 and the subscriber prefix length Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 19)
