nanog mailing list archives
Re: What DNS Is Not
From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:02:07 -0600
DNS is NOT always defined by Paul... :)
I agree Bill, but Paul is right on the money about how the DNS is being misused and abused to create more smoke and mirrors in the domain name biz. I really find annoying that some ISPs (several large ones among them) are still tampering with the DNS responses just to put few more coins on their coffers from click through advertising. What I'm really afraid is that all the buzz and $$ from the domain biz will create strong resistance to any efforts to develop a real directory service or better better scheme for resource naming and location. BTW simulations != real world. Cheers Jorge
Current thread:
- RE: What DNS Is Not, (continued)
- RE: What DNS Is Not Buhrmaster, Gary (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not David Andersen (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not bmanning (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Edward Lewis (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Martin Hannigan (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not bmanning (Nov 09)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jorge Amodio (Nov 08)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Glen Turner (Nov 16)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Brandon Galbraith (Nov 16)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Jack Bates (Nov 16)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Andrew Cox (Nov 19)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Randy Bush (Nov 19)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Matthew Palmer (Nov 20)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Eduardo A. Suárez (Nov 19)
- Re: What DNS Is Not Mark Andrews (Nov 19)
