nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01]
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:03:43 +0200
a few questions. IPv6 on your radar? Looking at options for addressing your future v6 needs? Have you looked at the IETF/ID in the subject line?
ULA looks always interesting, but tends to end up in obscurity because the right folks don't buy in. Anyway, the proposal brings IPv6 down to about 40 globally routable bits, compared to 21 to 24 in IPv4. That's still a lot, though. A further simplification would replace the Global ID with the AS number. A real improvement over IPv4 would embed distinct IDs for location and identity of any subnet, but that would probably mean that subnets receive less than 64 bits.
Current thread:
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01], (continued)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Stephen Sprunk (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 26)
- RE: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Tony Hain (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Bill Stewart (Apr 29)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Mans Nilsson (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] sthaug (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Richard Barnes (Apr 22)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] bmanning (Apr 21)
