nanog mailing list archives
Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:00:36 +0000
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:54:38PM -0700, steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
I seem to recollect back the 1999 or 2000 times that I was unable to register a domain name that was 24 characters long. Shortly after that, I heard that the character limit had been increased to like 128 characters, and we were able to register the name. Can anyone offer some input, or is this a memory of a bad dream? ;-] -- Steve Pirk Yensid
the foundational DNS spec sez: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt 2.3.1 [elided] There are also some restrictions on the length. Labels must be 63 characters or less. /bill
Current thread:
- Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? steve pirk [egrep] (Sep 30)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? bmanning (Sep 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? steve pirk [egrep] (Sep 30)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? Joe Hamelin (Sep 30)
- Re: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters? steve pirk [egrep] (Sep 30)
