nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 13:06:29 +0000
On 01/11/2012 12:20, Masataka Ohta wrote:
We should better introduce partially decimal format for IPv6 addresses or, better, avoid IPv6 entirely.
No we shouldn't. Text representations of IPv6 addresses are already a complete pain to parse. We don't need to add to this pain by adding a new format which gains us nothing in particular over existing schemas such as that suggested by Eugeniu. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Masataka Ohta (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Zachary Giles (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Nick Hilliard (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Sander Steffann (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? Alexander Maassen (Nov 04)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 04)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? Tom Paseka (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Masataka Ohta (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Chip Marshall (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Karl Auer (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
