nanog mailing list archives
Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services?
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:01:30 -0800
On Nov 27, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Carlos Kamtha <kamtha () ak-labs net> wrote:
Hi, We have an anycast provider (internap) that cannot give us direct service in the AU region. I'm wondering if there are providers, not specifically internap, that will allow another local ISP to 'transit' anycast IP services thier behalf?
Why not just originate the services from a prefix (or multiple prefixes) of your own? Then you can pick and choose who
you use where. You still have to be careful that people don't "helpfully" backhaul stuff to places you don't want, but
at least the policy lever is in your hands.
Short answer is yes, we do this for people all the time, and I'm sure many of the other large anycast providers do as
well.
Renesys could probably tell you which ones, specifically.
-Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- 3rd party transit for anycast services? Carlos Kamtha (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Bill Woodcock (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Carlos Kamtha (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Carlos Kamtha (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Carlos Kamtha (Nov 27)
- Re: 3rd party transit for anycast services? Bill Woodcock (Nov 27)
