nanog mailing list archives
Re: Suggestion on Fiber tester
From: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell () utc edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:36:28 -0400
On 9/26/2013 6:53 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
What flavor of multimode fiber are you dealing with? The answer and the distance you can run becomes substantially more important at 10G. Hopefully you're at least dealing with OM3. OM1/OM2 imposes distance limitations and you'll likely need mode-conditioning jumpers to work at 10G.
Excellent point. We have some over-a-decade old 62.5u MM that is useless for 10G (practically useless at 1G). It was fine at the time for 10Mb 10FL, but is now deprecated into oblivion. New runs are SM between buildings, and 50u OM3/OM4 inside. Another surprise that can vary by vendor... but "retail" Cisco LRM is cheaper than their SR, and is made for MM fiber (granted, OM3/OM4 ideally). Jeff
Current thread:
- Suggestion on Fiber tester Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List (Sep 25)
- Re: Suggestion on Fiber tester Darius Jahandarie (Sep 25)
- RE: Suggestion on Fiber tester Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List (Sep 25)
- Re: Suggestion on Fiber tester Niels Bakker (Sep 26)
- Re: Suggestion on Fiber tester Niels Bakker (Sep 26)
- RE: Suggestion on Fiber tester Kate Gerry (Sep 26)
- RE: Suggestion on Fiber tester Justin M. Streiner (Sep 27)
- Re: Suggestion on Fiber tester Jeff Kell (Sep 27)
- RE: Suggestion on Fiber tester Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List (Sep 25)
- Re: Suggestion on Fiber tester Darius Jahandarie (Sep 25)
- Re: Suggestion on Fiber tester Carlos Alcantar (Sep 26)
