Re: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...."

[Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>]

Spybot, adaware, and MalWare bytes.

I hadn't even thought of them; I was all fixated on Ookla... and why it wouldn't work.

I will query those folks.

Cheers,
- jra


On February 18, 2014 3:56:19 PM EST, Robert Drake <rdrake () direcpath com> wrote:
> On 2/18/2014 2:19 PM, James Milko wrote:
> > Is using data from a self-selected group even meaningful when
> > extrapolated?  It's been a while since Stats in college, and it's
> very
> > likely the guys from MIT know more than I do, but one of the big
> things
> > they pushed was random sampling.
> >
> > JM
> Isn't it probable that people who know enough to download the spoofer 
> projects program and run it might also be in position to fix things
> when 
> it's broken, or they may just be testing their own networks which 
> they've already secured, just to verify they got it right.
>
> I may put it on my laptop and start testing random places like 
> Starbucks, my moms house, conventions and other things, but if I'm 
> running it from my home machine it's just to get the gold "I did this"
> star.
>
> So yeah, data from the project is probably meaningless unless someone 
> uses it as a worm payload and checks 50,000 computers randomly (of 
> course I don't advise this.  I just wish there was a way to really push
>
> this to be run by everyone in the world for a week)
>
> Maybe with enough hype we could get CNN to advise people to download 
> it.  Actually, it would be nice if someone who writes security software
>
> like NOD32 or Malwarebytes, or spybot, adaware, etc, would integrate it
>
> into their test suite.  Then you get the thousands of users from them 
> added to the results.

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.