nanog mailing list archives
Re: IoT security
From: Richard <rgolodner () infratection com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:41:19 -0600
On 02/07/2017 02:27 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Looking at my logs from the past couple of months I think you are being generous by giving it thirty seconds.On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:56:40AM -0500, William Herrin wrote:Immaterial. The point is to catch vulnerable devices before they're hacked.you have a 30 second window there, maybe five minutes if you are lucky.
Richard
Current thread:
- IoT security William Herrin (Feb 06)
- Re: IoT security Michael Thomas (Feb 06)
- Re: IoT security joel jaeggli (Feb 06)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 06)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Tom Beecher (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Randy Bush (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Richard (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Ed Lopez (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Damian Menscher (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Carl Byington (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 07)
