nanog mailing list archives

Re: Identifying submarine links via traceroute


From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 08:39:50 -0400

Nice challenge.

Check out infrapedia.com where you can see length of cables and this may
help you “guess” latency but given so many cables are within 5-10ms in some
paths there may be  false positives

A very good topic to work on.

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 08:22 PAUL R BARFORD <pb () cs wisc edu> wrote:

Hello,

I am a researcher at the University of Wisconsin.  My colleagues at
Northwestern University and I are studying submarine cable infrastructure.

Our interest is in identifying submarine links in traceroute
measurements.  Specifically, for a given end-to-end traceroute measurement,
we would like to be able to identify when two hops are separated by a
submarine cable.  Our initial focus has been on inter-hop latency, which
can expose long links.  The challenge is that terrestrial long-haul links
may have the same or longer link latencies as short submarine links. So,
we're interested in whether there may be other features (e.g., persistent
congestion, naming conventions in router interfaces, peering details, etc.)
or techniques that would indicate submarine links.

Any thoughts or insights you might have would be greatly appreciated -
off-list responses are welcome.

Thank you.

Regards, PB

Paul Barford
University of Wisconsin - Madison

-- 
Mehmet
+1-424-298-1903

Current thread: