nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream bandwidth usage
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 21:17:25 +0000
Right. But MOST is, which is what matters for the trend. Existing asymmetric PONs is unlikely to be replaced for the next 20 years. -mel via cell
On Jun 11, 2022, at 11:11 AM, Chris Hills <chaz () chaz6 com> wrote: On 10/06/2022 00:31, Mel Beckman wrote:Your point on asymmetrical technologies is excellent. But you may not be aware that residential optical fiber is also asymmetrical. For example, GPON, the latest ITU specified PON standard, and the most widely deployed, calls for a 2.4 Gbps downstream and a 1.25 Gbps upstream optical line rate.Not all residential fiber is asymmetric. Nokia XGS-PON supports 9.953 Tx/Rx (e.g. LTF7226 transceiver).
Current thread:
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage, (continued)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Aled Morris via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Brandon Martin (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Jay Hennigan (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Matthew Crocker (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Chris Hills (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Karsten Thomann via NANOG (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Dave Taht (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 12)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 11)
