nanog mailing list archives
Re: jon postel
From: bzs () theworld com
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 19:31:21 -0400
On October 16, 2022 at 14:18 randy () psg com (Randy Bush) wrote:
my favorite is It's perfectly appropriate to be upset. I thought of it in a slightly different way--like a space that we were exploring and, in the early days, we figured out this consistent path through the space: IP, TCP, and so on. What's been happening over the last few years is that the IETF is filling the rest of the space with every alternative approach, not necessarily any better. Every possible alternative is now being written down. And it's not useful. -- Jon Postel
Early unix had a similar philosophical debate. Everything is a simple
file (including most devices), make commands which do one thing and do
it well so they can be connected together in new ways (an almost
prescient view on the ubiquity of multi-cpu/core systems), when in
doubt generalize and let the user specialize for their needs, don't
try to guess everything your program will be used for.
Then we got: POP-QUIZ! Name which letters a-z which aren't options to
ls?
Granted computing was more data processing than UI back then, but even
desktop apps like word processing had this style (e.g., a separate
program to format math equations or tables which could be piped into
from the general word processing program in a pipeline, and another to
do final formatting for the printing device.)
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs () TheWorld com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
Current thread:
- jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Noah (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Dave Taht (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel bzs (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Nathan Angelacos (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Daniel Sterling (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Joseph (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Elmar K. Bins (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Grant Taylor via NANOG (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Carsten Bormann (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Grant Taylor via NANOG (Oct 17)
- RE: jon postel Adam Thompson (Oct 20)
- Re: jon postel Dave Taht (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: jon postel Noah (Oct 16)
